Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Military junta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 05:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Military junta

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Already considered in greater depth in Military dictatorship. Slatersteven (talk) 13:59, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Military dictatorship. ^Semi_Hypercube ✎ 19:42, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:54, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not the same as a military dictatorship - a junta works by committee, a military dictatorship - not always. Is clearly notable in even a cursory BEFORE.Icewhiz (talk) 06:17, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Per Hzh's comment, a reverse merge of Junta (governing body) into this article (as it is beyond a short dictdef and a disambig mention of Whig Junto about Military juntas, and Military junta seems preferably to Junta (governing body) in terms of title) would also be a possible outcome.Icewhiz (talk) 08:43, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A notable subject. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:12, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A notable subject just needs to be expanded on. Shotgun pete (talk) 1:16, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Comment Seems to be the almost the same subject as Junta (governing body). Debatable if it should be a separate article, but delete would be inappropriate for something clearly notable and a likely search term, it is therefore merge or keep. Hzh (talk) 20:18, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - For those who don't speak Spanish, "Junta" means Council or Committee. There are several people in a Junta. A "dictator," on the other hand, is one person. A "Junta" can never be a "dictator" because a committee can never be a person. XavierItzm (talk) 09:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this probably can (and should) be expanded, but right now it functions as a list of governments referred to as military juntas, which is sufficient to justify the article. Neutral on a merge with Junta (governing body), I oppose a merge with Military dictatorship. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is a notable topic and clearly distinct from military dictatorship (not all military juntas are dictatorships, neither are all military dictatorships governed by a junta), even if the article does indeed need work and expansion. Impru20^talk 21:35, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.